When the Media Gets It Wrong: Why Language Matters when Writing about People with Disabilities

Text reading "Disabilities" above a drawing of an umbrella with the text, ".Visual, Hearing, Learning, Autism, Physical, Emotional, Cognitive" written in the folds and "Speech or Language" on handle

Image: iconshut.com

A few years ago, I was reading an article in the Washington Post that mentioned several political appointees with disabilities. All of them were intelligent and accomplished, according to the article, but I remember cringing when the columnist used the term, “wheelchair-bound,” to describe them. This was not the first time I’d seen poor word choices used to report on people with disabilities in mainstream media, and it would not be the last.

You may be asking, “What’s wrong with the term wheelchair-bound?” Well, first of all, it is not accurate. Bound, in this context, means “confined to.” This is not the case for people who use wheelchairs. Many people who use wheelchairs transfer out of them to sit at restaurants, drive, bathe and do all kinds of other things. Some of them only use wheelchairs on certain occasions, or also use other mobility aids. For example, one of the appointees mentioned in the article, Tammy Duckworth (who was recently elected to the House of Representatives, but at the time, was an Assistant Secretary at the Department of Veterans Affairs) also uses prosthetic legs.

Even people who cannot transfer out of their wheelchairs by themselves are not “bound” or tied to the chair; rather they use it as a means to get around. If you rely on your car, because there is a lack of public transportation in your town, are you “car-bound”? Why not simply write that a person “uses a wheelchair”? (For more about language and disability, check out Emily Ladau’s excellent blog post, “Reflections on Language through the Lens of Disability“).

This is not a matter of “political correctness” or people being “overly sensitive.” There is a reason language about certain groups of people (e.g., women, minorities) has evolved over the years. Some words are no longer acceptable, because they are offensive or hurtful. Any woman who has been called “honey,” “sweetie” or “dear” in the workplace by an older male colleague can attest to what it feels like to be demeaned by words, even if that was not the intent.

Disability advocates have been fighting the battle to get the media to use appropriate word choices when writing about people with disabilities for decades. Judging from what I’ve read recently, while there has been some improvement in this area, there is still work to be done. It should not be difficult to stop using antiquated phrases like “wheelchair-bound,” which re-enforce old stereotypes that people with disabilities are victims, and yet sometimes it feels like members of the media have been slow to adapt the way they write about people with disabilities. I believe these changes do make a difference – that they go a long way to altering perceptions of people with disabilities – so I will continue to fight for them, both professionally and personally.

The push to advocate for word choices that are respectful to people with disabilities isn’t limited to members of the media. Special Olympics has been leading a very successful and important effort called, “End the R-Word,” for the past several years to spread public awareness about how offensive and demeaning using the words “retard” or “retarded” in a derogatory manner is to people with intellectual disabilities, their families and friends. One young man in a video on the site illustrates the point perfectly when he says, “I’m not retarded. I’m Eric.”

Special Olympics and many others involved in the movement were very vocal with their criticism when political pundit Ann Coulter used the “R-word” on Twitter to describe President Obama following the third presidential debate. There has also been public outcry over the use of the “R-word” in movies, such as “Tropic Thunder” and “The Descendants.”

Thanks to the “End the R-Word” campaign and others, progress is being made. Recently, film director Adam McKay agreed to nix the word from the upcoming sequel to “Anchorman,” CNN reported positively on the campaign and last year, when comedian Rick Younger used the R-word on The Today Show, host Kathie Lee Gifford immediately told him, “We don’t use that word here.” Perhaps the most effective part of the campaign, however, is the “Not Acceptable” public service announcement, which compares the “R-word” to slurs used against other minority groups.

Some recommendations for writing about people with disabilities include:

  1. Using the word “disability,” rather than “handicapped”;
  2. Avoiding the use of the words “normal” or “normally” as a comparison to people with disabilities (e.g., People who speak with a stutter often experience more difficulty on job interviews than people who speak normally.);
  3. Avoiding terms that project a negative connotation (e.g. wheelchair-bound); and
  4. Not overusing the word “special,” as in “special needs” or “special populations.”

A note about person-first language: The use of person-first language (i.e, “people with disabilities” rather than “disabled people”) is preferred by some people with disabilities, but not all. Many people with disabilities, particularly in the deaf and autistic communities, prefer identity-first language (i.e., “autistic” or “autistic person” rather than “person with autism”).

Writing about people with disabilities (of which there are nearly 57 million in the U.S. alone) in a respectful, positive manner isn’t difficult. Simply following the guidelines above and advocating for members of the media to do the same will go a long way in helping to change perceptions about people with disabilities, so they are fully included in their communities and the workforce.

Diana Zeitzer is the communications director for Disability.gov. She is a proud Penn State alumna, who enjoys running marathons and performing improv comedy.

Updated October 2015

55 thoughts on “When the Media Gets It Wrong: Why Language Matters when Writing about People with Disabilities

  1. I agree, and I have another one for your list: the insensitive use of the word “autistic.” I rankle when people refer to my son as “autistic.”

    I have a son who has autism. Behaviors are autistic, not people.

    When people say “He’s autistic,” I feel like they are putting his disability first and not him. I also feel it depersonalizes him and sets him apart, as if he were another species, other than human (which I’ve actually had people say to me).

    Fortunately, I hear this term in reference to people less and less. I believe this is because of the very great changes that are happening in our society regarding the inclusion of people with disabilities in our schools, workplaces, and on our screens. And, of course, articles like yours, which are greatly appreciated!

    There will always be people who are unaware (and then will change when educated), others who know but just are plain insensitive (those are the ones who groan about political correctness), and some who are patently brutal and want to hurt with words (Ms. Coulter being the prime example). I direct my energies to raising awareness among those who can be influenced.

    Efforts to educate people who are simply unaware but want to talk about disabilities with sensitivity are really paying off. It needs to start with the media and journalists, however, as that is where so many people get their information.

  2. Thank you for your comment, Mary! You are absolutely correct that people often say someone is autistic, instead of saying he or she is a person who has autism. I am hearing this less and less, as people become more educated, and I hope the trend continues this way. Also, I am glad to see so much more about autism in the media, both in print and TV news, and on television shows like “Parenthood.” Television may not always get it right, but showing people with disabilities as a part of everyday life is so important.

  3. Thank you for speaking out on this important issue! So many people say so many if these things without realizing how ridiculous they doing and that they are inadvertently setting limits and using one tiny characteristic to describe an entire person.

  4. Hi Diana. This article is wonderful. I would like to connect with you offline about this topic however, I wanted to share with you that this topic was presented by colleague Holly Nielsen at this year’s PRSA International Confernce. The session was sponsored by the Diversity Committee. I am the 2013 Diversity Chair and am a huge advocate for disability and why it should not be ignored when discussing diversity.

    Check out the presentation from conference here: http://www.prsa.org/Conferences/InternationalConference/program/data/display/5323/Ability_Beyond_Disability_Understanding_Accessibil

    Would love to connect with you. Thanks!

    • Hi Brandi,

      Thank you so much for your nice comment on my blog post, and for sharing Holly’s wonderful presentation! I’m so glad to hear it was a topic at the PRSA conference, and that as the new Diversity Chair, you understand how important it is to include disability in the discussion when talking about diversity. I’m looking forward to connecting with you! Feel free to email me at dzeitzer@conceptspr.com.



  5. In the UK and amongst disability activists in the US, the term ‘disabled person/people’ is preferred because it states the fact that people with various conditions are made not able to do things by the physical and societal barriers put in our way to achieving the things we need. On top of which, members of the Blind, Deaf, and Autistic Communities prefer identity-first language on the basis that it’s obvious one doesn’t believe they’re people if one has to put oneself through linguistic gymnastics to remind oneself of that fact (adjective-noun order is more natural in the English language).

    • Yes, there is some debate about the use of person-first language in the U.S. I can’t speak to the UK, but I have to disagree about “disabled person/people” being the preferred term among disability activists. I work with and know personally many people in the disability community that identify as disability activists, and they prefer person-first language. Of course as you mentioned, among certain groups of people with disabilities, the preference is identity-first. It is a very personal thing. However, I think certain terms (handicapped, wheelchair bound, crippled) are offensive across the board.

      • I agree that handicapped and wheelchair bound are offensive terms, the latter especially, but as a crutches user I sometimes refer to myself as a cripple (“I’m crippled, not stupid!”), and the only way it would bother me if others used it is if they did so in a derogatory way.
        Also, I said “amongst disability activists”, not “all disability activists”. A small distinction, but an important one.

  6. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association has developed an excellent resource about appropriate ways to write and speak about people with disabilities. They recommend:
    1. Using person-first language;
    2. Using the word “disability,” rather than “handicapped”;
    3. Avoiding the use of the words “normal” or “normally” as a comparison to people with disabilities (e.g., People who speak with a stutter often experience more difficulty on job interviews than people who speak normally.);
    4. Avoiding terms that project a negative connotation (e.g. wheel-chair bound); and
    5. Not overusing the word “special,” as in “special needs” or “special populations.”

    Oh, I never thought of this before. So, in order to show maximum respect, I should refer to you as a person with femaleness and Americanism, and totally disregard your choice of how to self-identify, just as person-firsters like you do when they tell me I’m not allowed to call myself an Autistic person, a dyslexic person, or a dyspraxic person. *facepalms*
    It would be far more respectful to defer to the preferences of the individuals and groups described, don’t you think?

  7. This article is not at all about trying to regulate how an individual chooses to self-identify. No one said you are “not allowed” to call yourself whatever you want. It is about how media uses language. Since it is not possible to ask every person how they prefer to self-identify, and many people find non person-first language offensive (see previous comments above), it is my personal opinion it’s best to use the wording that is found least offensive. Out of curiosity, do you find person first language offensive? As a person with a learning disability, I do find the term “learning disabled” pretty offensive.

    • No one said you are “not allowed” to call yourself whatever you want.
      Tell that to those who’ve told me, “Don’t you mean you’re a person with autism?”
      Er, no. I’m a person with a backpack, and I’m Autistic. I’ve never accidentally left my Autism on a bus.
      Since it is not possible to ask every person how they prefer to self-identify, and many people find non person-first language offensive […]
      Whereas it is possible to know that the vast majority of ActuallyAutistic people prefer identity-first language, it’s their families who prefer person-first unless they’re Autistic or otherwise neurodivergent themselves. Same as with blind people and deaf people.
      Out of curiosity, do you find person first language offensive?
      In relation to my disabilities, yes. I’m not a person with a disability, I’m a disabled person. The former says that there’s something wrong with me the way I am, the latter states the fact that I could take a fuller role in society if it weren’t for the barriers thrown up before me because they make me ‘not able’. In fact, I find identity-first language more often puts the person first than ‘person-first’ language does because not only do I not get the feeling that I’m only Autism and nothing else to someone who feels they have to put themselves through linguistic gymnastics to remind themselves that I’m a person, but when someone uses identity-first language about any of my conditions, they accept them as only a part of me the same as my gender and my skin tone are.
      BTW, I’ve commented on this blog before, but I forgot. Sorry.

      • Hi again – I wanted to thank you for your comments. I think you bring up some very important points. Obviously if certain groups prefer identify first language, that should be reflected in the blog post I wrote. I’m going to reach out to PRSA to see if it is possible to update the information in the post about person first language. I’ve also reached out to the National Council on Disability to see if they have any guidance regarding person first vs. identify first language, particularly for the autistic community. Thank you again for your comments!

      • Obviously if certain groups prefer identify first language, that should be reflected in the blog post I wrote. I’m going to reach out to PRSA to see if it is possible to update the information in the post about person first language.
        That’s good of you. Thank you very much.🙂

  8. We absolutely love your blog and find many of your post’s to be what precisely I’m looking for.

    can you offer guest writers to write content for you? I wouldn’t mind creating a post or elaborating on a lot of
    the subjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome website!

  9. I bloig frequently and I seriously appreciate your information. The article has truly peaked my interest.
    I will book mark your website andd keep checking for new
    details about once per week. I opted in for your Feed as well.

  10. I can’t speak to the UK, but I have to disagree about “disabled person/people” being the preferred term among disability activists.
    Yeah, disability activists, not disabled activists. The same way that there’s a fifty/fifty divide between person-first and identity-first languages amongst the Autism Community, but identity-first language is preferred by over 80% of the Autistic Community. Just sayin’.

  11. excellent put up, very informative. I ponder why the oppositfe specialists of this sector don’t notice this.

    You shopuld proceed your writing. I’m confident, you have a great readers’ base already!

  12. Experimenting with random objects that you already
    personal is a great way to show unusual elements into
    free jewelry supplies. Think exterior the box – key rings, hair ties and bottle caps all make awesome jewelry
    provides. Particular promotions are often introduced on social media, so ensure that to observe your favourite stores on all platforms.

  13. Earlier than you see a specialist, your general dentist ought to explain to you
    why the referral is really useful. She or he should share your dental information, x-rays, and any relevant dental
    and health info with the specialty dentist.

  14. My daughter has a chore chart- I maintain her in all methods but when she DESIRES something she should earn it.
    Low self-esteem is confirmed to lead to drugs, promiscuity, and plenty of other not so pretty issues.

    Its good so that you can communicate up and query things and possibly we’ll find one thing we will agree on…or not, nevertheless it does
    not make both of us proper or incorrect.
    These are Some Ideas You can Try or Provide you with Your Personal.

  15. Make sure that to consider package themes or bundles if you use the bus hire to get the most out
    of your evening and your cash. Taking the choice of Mini
    Bus Hire carries many benefits over hiring a standard sized car
    and also adds a little bit additional enjoyable in driving one thing
    completely different from what you normally could also be used to.
    It includes the very best mountains in Northern Eire and the province of

  16. Attractive part of content. I simply stumbled upon yyour website and in accession capital to assert that I
    acquire actually loved account your weblog posts.
    Anyway I will be subscribing in your augment or even I fulfillment you get admission tto persistently quickly.

  17. This manner encourages individuals to make use of bank card from bank, which
    the bank will take the price of the bank card for sellers, boosting gross sales amount.
    In online stores, there are lots of items for buyer to buy from
    different categories and kinds. This technique of shopping
    will even increase up the use of online cost technique in addition to delivery service
    which will grow to be vital for this method.

  18. Ex-partner Dr best way to lose belly ffat Kevin Krause.
    It can be ery ineffective in dealing with the program falls apart.
    If you wish to attain long-lasting effect. Diseases
    That Cause best way to lose belly fat Weight. 1 -2 tablespoons oof naturral bodybuilxing is a
    muscle. When you eat for 382 days. It’s also possible to stay
    on track.

  19. Terrific post but I was wanting to know if you
    could write a litte more on this subject? I’d
    be very thankful if you could elaboratte a little bit further.
    Appreciate it!

  20. This is really fascinating, You’re an overly professional blogger.
    I have joined your feed and stay up for looking for more of your wonderful post.
    Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks

  21. Air, water, minerals, and organic matter are
    all components of healthy soil. Well, if you are thinking
    how to get the track for your garden railroad, you may have to
    consider some factors first. * Floating water plants: Hyacinth and cabomba are examples of this type of plant which float
    on the surface of the water.

  22. You could definitely see your expertise within the article you
    write. The arena hopes for more passionate writers like you who
    aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. At all times follow your heart.

  23. Awesome website you have here but I was curious if you knew of any user discussion forums that cover the same topics talked about here?

    I’d really love to be a part of online community where I can get feedback from
    other knowledgeable people that share the same interest.
    If you have any recommendations, please let me know.
    Thank you!

  24. Hi there, I found your blog bby means of Google at the same
    time as lookiing for a comparable topic, your site got here up, it seems
    great. I’ve bookmarked it in my googlle bookmarks.

    Hi there, just was aware of your weblog via Google, and located that it’s really informative.

    I am going to watch ouut ffor brussels. I will
    be grateful iif you continue this in future.
    Numerous other folks will ljkely be benefited from your writing.


  25. heey there and thank you for your information – I’ve certainly picked up something new
    from right here. I diid however expertise several technical issues using this web site,
    as I experienced to reload the website many times previous to I could get it to load
    correctly. I had been wondering if your web hoset is OK?
    Not that I am complaining, but slow loazding instances times will sometjmes
    affect your placejent inn google and could damage your quality score
    if ads andd marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my
    email and can look out for a lot more of your respective interesting content.

    Make sure you update this again soon.

  26. Moreover, diseases can come about when an individual’s cells become harmed because of
    those destructive fats. Your body definitely needs fat for your energy – but not as much fat as most people
    eat. Weight Loss Tip #3 – Do Some Kind of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT).

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s